Sigs not working?

[Enrico]

Maybe it's just me but all sigs stopped working. Now I just see a link to people's sigs under their posts where you have to click on the link to view it. Anyone else having that problem?

[Snowflake]

It's you

[themak]

it happens every once and a while, the images become links instead.

[SamIAM™]

no i disabled the image tag in sigs. people starting to abuse it.

[Enrico]

That sucks.

[UberAnt]

lol @ people starting to abuse it...


it's only 150x500 max... im not sure what does abusing means...


i don't care about sigs but that was an interesting comment

[themak]

lol @ people starting to abuse it...


it's only 150x500 max... im not sure what does abusing means...


i don't care about sigs but that was an interesting comment

Actually you could put any size image if it was hosted on another site. Remember Hadeer's sister had that huge flyer in her signature?

[Enrico]

So is that what he meant by people abusing it? Why not set a size limit?

[UberAnt]

Actually you could put any size image if it was hosted on another site. Remember Hadeer's sister had that huge flyer in her signature?


oh I didn't know that...

well... he could disable that feature... or set a size limit instead of disabling the signature as a whole..

[JerkFace]

its cause idiots have disgusting sigs

[Enrico]

its cause idiots have disgusting sigs

Who in particular? Mine wasn't disgusting.

[1_of_a_kind]

NO body wants to see 2 guys laying in a bed. If you like that stuff keep it to your self you don't have to ruin it for others.


Thanks Sam

[Enrico]

I believe you're referring to Younan's avatar. That wasn't in a sig.

[JerkFace]

when you see straight people using avatars & sigs of pussies & tits etc......then you can use your suggestive avatars & sigs....since your so lost i explained to you k?

[Enrico]

If I had actually used an av/sig of a man's penis or bare ass then you might have an argument but since I've never posted bare nudity in my sigs/avs I'll take it that you're just over exaggerating to try to make your point. So a baby wearing a shirt with the word "SLUT" on it isn't suggestive huh but a pic of a shirtless guy is? Interesting....

Oh, and I went in your profile page and looky what I found:







http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/1872/59604796hf9.jpg


Can you say hypocrite? Double standard maybe? That's far more sexually graphic and suggestive than anything I've had in my sigs/avs. I know that wasn't in your sig and you might remove it from your page by the time anyone reads this but that's just funny to me that you even think you have an argument, especially considering that you've repeatedly posted pics of people defecating and other disgusting acts. By the way to the mods, this isn't some protest of wanting to get sigs back. I just wanted to know what the story behind this was and I think there could be a better solution than just disabling everyone's sigs but it's not my decision.

[JerkFace]

ok inspector gadget that on my profile which not everyone sees unless they go to it...your sigs & avatar are always something sexually suggestive...not sayin i never had anythin sexual either but its not about what pics i got or posted...its about your disgusting avatar & sigs that are repulsive.

[Enrico]

ok inspector gadget that on my profile which not everyone sees unless they go to it...
Which is why I mentioned it wasn't in your sig or did you miss that? Even so, it doesn't mean anyone can't see it with the click of a button and it's still far more sexual than anything I've used as my sig/av. People also have the option of disabling sigs in their user control panel if they find it repulsive, which why anyone would of a shirtless man is beyond me. Sounds to me like an issue of not being comfortable with your sexuality or something if you can't handle if seeing a shirtless guy. How do you cope when you're at a pool or beach?

.your sigs & avatar are always something sexually suggestive...not sayin i never had anythin sexual either but its not about what pics i got or posted...
Actually no they're not. Do you have track of every av and sig I've used to make that claim?
ts about your disgusting avatar & sigs that are repulsive.
Oh, so it's all about me is it? lol So you're saying we CAN use sexually suggestive pics as long as their in our profile?? What's repulsive to you isn't to someone else and I don't believe rules on pics differ from whether they're just posted in threads or used as sigs/avs so the numerous pics you've posted of fecal matter fall into that category too. The term "sexually suggestive"; is far too vague anyway. One person might think a woman posing in a bikini is sexually suggestive while another person might only think it was if she was posed spread eagle whilst pouring water all over her chest. Your avatar could be interpreted as "sexually suggestive" as a means of promoting pedophilia. This is all just funny to me because I don't remember it being an issue until people starting using "men" in their sigs/avs. When people were using scantily clad women, I don't remember anyone making it an issue.

[DOOM]

Bottom line: sigs and avatars didn't become problematic and weren't regulated til enrico started posting his shit...Something to think about...

[JerkFace]

its inspiring how much time & effort you put forth into inane debates....here im wrong your right k

[Enrico]

Bottom line: sigs and avatars didn't become problematic and weren't regulated til enrico started posting his shit...Something to think about...

Says who? You wouldn't even know because you don't know what people use as sigs and avs but immediately after Youanan came out as being bi he started using a bunch of different sigs/avs of men in bed together and even though they were fully clothed I'm willing to bet that's why Sam disabled the sigs. Not that Sam hasn't had an issue with my sigs/avs I've used but I made sure to keep them within good taste and not overly provocative. its inspiring how much time & effort you put forth into inane debates....here im wrong your right k It takes me about 2-3 min at the most to post a reply and not much effort either. You just can't hold a logical argument and have zero credibility because you're guilty of everything you threw at me.

[JerkFace]

no because all you look forward to is arguing about senseless things day to day thats why your always up Hadeer's ass on every single thread everyday....so i wish nt to part take in a idiotic debate with you over sigs & avatars...the end!

[DOOM]

Says who? You wouldn't even know because you don't know what people use as sigs and avs but immediately after Youanan came out as being bi he started using a bunch of different sigs/avs of men in bed together and even though they were fully clothed I'm willing to bet that's why Sam disabled the sigs. Not that Sam hasn't had an issue with my sigs/avs I've used but I made sure to keep them within good taste and not overly provocative.
If you're refering to me not being able to see what people use as sigs/avs, are you familiar with people narrating to you what's going on? So yes I'm aware enough of what's going on. Having said all that: I don't need to be aware of what people use as sigs and avs. Aren't you the one who started this thread, and haven't you started other similar threads in the past about your depictions being blocked/disabled? Enough said.

[Enrico]

no because all you look forward to is arguing about senseless things day to day thats why your always up Hadeer's ass on every single thread everyday....so i wish nt to part take in a idiotic debate with you over sigs and avatars...the end!

I never asked for your input. You offered it and and then got frustrated when you realized how weak your argument was. If you're refering to me not being able to see what people use as sigs/avs, are you familiar with people narrating to you what's going on? So yes I'm aware enough of what's going on. That would depend on WHO is actually narrating it to you because if it's Jerkface or anyone else with bias they could easily lie or stretch the truth as he did in this thread when he suggested that I used male genitalia as my av/sig. Having said all that: I don't need to be aware of what people use as sigs and avs. Yes you do. Aren't you the one who started this thread Yes. What's your point? and haven't you started other similar threads in the past about your depictions being blocked/disabled? Not that I remember. If it was something only affecting me I'd PM someone but I say that this was an issue with the entire forum so I made it a thread.

[UberAnt]

omg it's stupid online signatures, get over it people, do you have to argue about the littlest things!



now go play my ****ing google game!

[JerkFace]

:lol: like i said erica your inspirational

[Enrico]

omg it's stupid online signatures, get over it people, do you have to argue about the littlest things!



now go play my ****ing google game!

Like I said, this wasn't a protest for the mods to over turn their decision. If Sam decides to keep them disabled fine but if Jerkyboy and anyone else is going to throw their two cents in I can as well.

[Emma_Girl]

ok inspector gadget that on my profile which not everyone sees unless they go to it...your sigs & avatar are always something sexually suggestive...not sayin i never had anythin sexual either but its not about what pics i got or posted...its about your disgusting avatar & sigs that are repulsive.

lol @ inspector gadget. nerd.